By Firoz.T.Totanawala
The Bangalore Metro Reporter
1st OCTOBER 2010 ISSUE-
THE FLOODING OF BENGALURU
The
food like situation which caused havoc on 24th September is an eye
opener to the civic authorities of Bangalore .
Even now, if they do not wake up the city will become another Kolkata of South.
The
current pathetic civic amenities of Bangalore
are the outcome of many reckless and irrational actions being undertaken by the
respective officials from the past. It is always essential to study the subject
in its entirety in order to understand it thoroughly. The civic amenities of
our city could have been much better had there been enough care and precaution
taken in the past. Let us take a bird’s eye view on the subject.
On
26th January 1976, the functions and activities of Planning
Authority of Bangalore , Urban Art Commission,
and Karnataka Housing Board, were merged to form the Bangalore Development Authority. The Urban Arts Commission was headed by a
learned T.P. Issar, an IAS officer who was not only a good disciplinarian but a
protectorate of some of the heritage of Bangalore .
The Town Planning authority was headed by K.S. Rame Gowda, a perfect town planner and a visionary who along with
Noor Ahmed (who later moved to PWD as Chief Engineer) were good advisers to the
then Chief Minister and Chairmen of erstwhile CITB. Up till 1976, the town
planning activities were under the frame work of Outline Development Plan of Bangalore which was known
as ODP and the concept of CDP evolved later.
Then
came the regime of R.Gundu Rao and R.K. Hegde and hell was let loose since
persons like Rame Gowda, N. Govindappa, T.N. Galgali were not available to
guide the Commissioners of BDA and the Government. Eminent personalities like,
Charles Corea, T.J. Doss, Mahmood Ayaz were all not there on the board of
directors of BDA. Persons loyal to the Chief Minister were picked and posted to
BDA who were more interested in getting allotment quota rather than developing
the city with future civic amenities. As a result the proposed schemes such as
BTM 4th 5th and 6th and the surrounding areas
of H.R.B.R., HBR, Banaswadi, M.R.C.R and Srigandadakaval layouts vanished into
the hands of land lords. These land lords, not only got compensation from BDA,
but also managed to sell their lands to needy public of Bangalore, which
resulted in the haphazard growth of small segments within the city as upper
class slums. By the time, when the CDP was put into practice the cat was out of
bag, narrow lanes with flow of sewage on the roads had started.
At
this juncture, the BCC collected development charges and issued khatas and
sanctioned building plans recklessly without bothering about the widths of the
roads. The greater loser was BDA, who
had neither reclaimed the compensation which were not deposited in the Civil
Courts nor collected the reconveyance charges from these beneficiaries of sites
on its lands. Thus, BDA incurred a loss of rupees one billion. If the BDA is
serious, then it should take courage to collect reconveyance charges and
regularization charges from the site owners who have constructed their houses
on its lands instead of demolishing which is not only a national loss but a
childish act.
In
the very early stage, there were two municipalities for the city of Bangalore,
one was called the Blackpally Cantonment Municipality for cantonment area, and
the another Bangalore City Municipality for southern Bangalore. These
municipalities were functioning perfectly with able guidance of persons like
Sir Mirza Ismail, the Dewan of erstwhile princely Mysore and Dewan Madhav Rao. The sewage system
and water supply to the citizens were met from Ippegondanahally and Hosakote
tanks. These Municipalities were merged in 1949 and there was no problem as far
as the drainage and sewage was concerned. There were only 60 divisions in the
Corporation at that time and it was capable to manage the city’s needs at least
till the year 1980.
The
problem started after the divisions were increased to 100. Now, the Government
had leaped beyond the metropolitan limits up to the rural areas and increased
the wards to 200 without bothering about the sewage system and the traffic
problems of the city which is a major bottleneck for its growth. During the
time of B.T. Somanna and HGV Reddy, there used to be seminars and symposiums
and eminent personalities like world famous Waghle use to give advice to the
then Chairmen about the planning of the city.
After their exit, no Chairman or Commissioner of BDA or BBMp bothered to
conduct such seminars, which has resulted in this chaos. Had the Bengaluru city
been on the bank of any river or sea port, then, nobody could have stopped it
from submerging. At least the Bangaloreans should thank God for not gifting the
city with a river or a sea.
No comments:
Post a Comment